Did you know?
On April 2, 1917, the United States declared war on Germany despite considerable public opposition. Just a few months after the United States entered the war, Secretary of the Treasury, William Gibbs McAdoo, called the public mood a “delirium”. Sauerkraut became liberty cabbage, German Shepards became Alsatians and the city of Syracuse banned pinochle, a German card game. The press published calls for mass hangings of “disloyal German-Americans” and some clergymen compared Germans to cholera germs that must be annihilated. Despite this, naturalized Germans collected relief funds for the Red Cross and served in the U.S. Army.
They banned pinochle? (Wikipedia informs me it is etymologically derived from the German Binokel.) ‘Liberty cabbage’ puts that whole ‘freedom fries’ episode in perspective. At least we aren’t getting any dumber. I wonder whether some shrewd entrepreneur marketed pinochle decks under the badass tempting slogan ‘banned in Syracuse!’
{ 37 comments }
fjm 12.07.06 at 2:16 am
Much worse in the long term is that foreign language teaching collapsed.
By 1940 almost the only children who learned modern foreign languages were the Mormons who needed them for overseas missions.
Daniel 12.07.06 at 3:07 am
Liberty cabbage’ puts that whole ‘freedom fries’ episode in perspective. At least we aren’t getting any dumber
Sadly, you are, since at least in 1917 you were at war with Germany. It would only have been comparable to “freedom fries” if the declaration of war on Germany had been accompanied with an upsurge of anti-Brazilian feeling or something.
abb1 12.07.06 at 3:33 am
Time to ban friggin algebra.
John Holbo 12.07.06 at 4:33 am
Daniel, I don’t think you are properly factoring the pinochle ban in.
Scott Martens 12.07.06 at 5:35 am
Until WWI there were still sizable enclaves in the America where second and third generation German-Americans still spoke primarily German. The wave of nativism that came on the war’s heels killed any linguistic diversity left in the US.
The New York City Math Teacher 12.07.06 at 7:14 am
A small hillish feature in the landscape near my birthplace is called Revonah Hill. Was it named for a Lenape or Iroquois word? No. 1917, somebody spelled Hanover backwards.
God, people can be stupid.
Russell Arben Fox 12.07.06 at 7:52 am
Even more: the anti-German hostility was repeated, in a much more informal and ad hoc way, during World War II, in which numerous legal and long-time German residents–and some citizens as well–were rounded up as potential “enemy aliens” and interned in camps along with other suspect types. The relocation and internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII gets most of the press, because it was so massive and the paper trail (presidential orders, courts cases, etc.) is so clear. But many German-Americans suffered once more during those years as well.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 8:01 am
In New Ulm MN there is a statue, locally called Herman the German, representing Armnius the Cherusci, the German leader who annihilated two Roman legions at Teutoborg forest — primarily by treachery. (This was the end of German attempts ro subdue the Germans). The statue was erected in 1897 and survived both world wars — how I don’t know.
There’s another statue of Herman in Detmold, Germany. There also was a philosophy translator (from the Arabic) named Herman the German.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 8:02 am
“Roman attempts to subdue the Germans”
Ron George 12.07.06 at 8:03 am
Has anyone checked this on snopes.com. I sort of doubt the liberty cabbage line.
Ron George 12.07.06 at 8:08 am
I was wrong to be suspicious — however it looks like sauerkraut was called “Victory Cabbage.” Hamburgers were called “Freedom Sandwiches.”
Unbelievable.
Maurice Meilleur 12.07.06 at 8:21 am
Actually, hamburger became “Salisbury steak,” as veterans of American public schools will remember, and weiners and frankfurters became hot dogs.
There are lots and lots of Millers and Smiths in the US who used to be Müllers and Schmidts. A few Germans, as I recall, were in fact lynched by nationalist mobs.
marc 12.07.06 at 8:28 am
And on the other side of the Atlantic we had Windsor (Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) and Mountbatten (Battenberg).
Mike 12.07.06 at 8:40 am
Unbelievable.
No, no, not at all. Typical, actually.
Steve LaBonne 12.07.06 at 8:52 am
And alcohol. And admirals! (The “more rubble less trouble” crowd really won’t like that last one…)
Chris Bertram 12.07.06 at 9:33 am
And Arsenal … actually that’s not such a bad idea.
magistra 12.07.06 at 10:06 am
Never mind algebra, just ban Arabic numerals altogether.
SamChevre 12.07.06 at 10:06 am
The Plain People (the Amish and Mennonites and Hutterites) were particularly brutalized, since they refuse to serve in the military in any capacity and spoke (and still speak) one of several varieties of German. It’s still remembered in our communities in a “Yes, it CAN happen here” way (along with Sheridan’s destruction of the Valley.)
Jacob Wipf
Josef Hofer
Michael Hofer
May their names be remembered.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 10:42 am
Some areas of Minnesota and Wisconsin are close to 100% German. I doubt that those Germans had problems. I believe that those communities polarized — there was significant draft-dodging, but other German-American felt obligated to serve in the military to prove their loyalty.
I believe that my Dutch ancestors started calling themselves “Hollanders” in WWI, because in American English “Dutch” equally meant German.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 11:13 am
A quick Google seems to show that English is the only language in which Hollanders/ Netherlanders are called “Dutch” (~ “Deutsch”).
CJColucci 12.07.06 at 11:18 am
I’m originally from Syracuse and never knew that. Next time I’m home, I’ll stop at the last two surviving German restaurants, eat myself into insensibility, and leave a big tip.
rea 12.07.06 at 11:32 am
Locals here in West Michigan sometimes wonder why the annual Berlin Fair (established 1855) takes place in a town named Marne . . .
Matt 12.07.06 at 11:59 am
Russell- I’m not 100% sure, but I do believe that the interned Germans (and Italians) were given individual hearings about loyalty and almost all were released in a fairly short period of time unlike the Japanese. At least this is what I recall reading on Eric Muller’s site. Quite likely many were treated unfairly and unjustly, but less so than the Japanese (I don’t read you as saying otherwise.)
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 12:28 pm
Someone just reported that in WWI Minnesota (70% foreign-born) the state government established a Committee of Public Safety with police state powers. Fear of immigrants was combined with fear of labor unrest. Herman the German’s New Ulm was tragetted by the CPS — some German-Americans were asking for non-combat assignments.
By 1932 the targets of the CPS were running the state, with a near-Socialist platform (the Farmer-Labor Party).
Aidan Kehoe 12.07.06 at 12:43 pm
A quick Google seems to show that English is the only language in which Hollanders/ Netherlanders are called “Dutch†(~ “Deutschâ€).
Uhh, except for Dutch, where Diets is not quite extinct, though the actions of those who promote its use are sending it in that direction.
The New York City Math Teacher 12.07.06 at 12:51 pm
In what conflicts prior to WWI did does one encounter this kind of ad-hoc ethno-national linguistic paranoia?
Off the top of my head, Balkan wars? I don’t remember reading anything about French speakers getting lynched in Frankfurt in 1814, nor in Metz in 1870.
1848 Hungarian uprising? 1877-8 anti-Circassian, Greek, Romanian, Bulgar, or anti-Turkish popular activism, a la the USA in 1914?
I’m having trouble remembering any. I am also having trouble recalling incidents of greater violence occurring in Great Britain or France than in the US.
The US had it worse.
Russell Arben Fox 12.07.06 at 1:04 pm
John,
“Some areas of Minnesota and Wisconsin are close to 100% German. I doubt that those Germans had problems.”
The patterns of relocation of Japanese-Americans throws some interesting light on where demographic realities and racial/economic hostilities crossed. Japanese-Americans were shipped to internment centers out of designated military areas, including practically all the West coast…but not Hawaii, the place you’d assume a demand for internment and depopulation would be strongest. Why not? In part because Japanese-Americans made up such a large portion of the islands’ population that to relocate them all might have crashed the local economy entirely. I suspect similar reasoning was at play in not harassing too much German-Americans who lived in communities as compact and homogenous as those in some parts of the upper Midwest.
Matt,
“I do believe that the interned Germans (and Italians) were given individual hearings about loyalty and almost all were released in a fairly short period of time unlike the Japanese. At least this is what I recall reading on Eric Muller’s site.”
Many were, but perhaps just as many weren’t. Complete data is extremely hard to come by and unreliable, because so many different agencies were involved in targeting, interviewing, detaining and interning suspected German and Italian-Americans on an ad hoc basis; there was no standard set of procedures. For example, in the case of Mathias Borniger–the Wichita, KS, resident whose story I told on my blog–you had a Boeing employee who someone thought might be sneaking photos of planes off to Hitler, who was picked up immediately after Pearl Harbor, interrogated, shipped off to a military camp for four months, then to an itnernment camp where he was held for nearly two years, being released in the fall of 1943. His case does not appear to have been atypical.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 1:16 pm
I was told by a woman who would now be about 60 that in Portland OR during WWII there was a 9:00 curfew for Italian-Americans. Portland was the whitest, most nativist city on the West Coast.
And my #19 should be qualified by a comment which may not have posted yet. Minnesota was actually very tense during WWI, with a police-state-like Committee of Public Safety.
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 1:19 pm
“Would now be about 80”
John Emerson 12.07.06 at 1:21 pm
The Dutch apparently had a Tweedledum-Tweedledee civil war between the Union of Utrecht and the Union of Atrecht. It sounds like a dialect cline.
Maynard Handley 12.07.06 at 2:07 pm
(1) WW1 was followed by the 1920s, perhaps the most racist decade in US history. That’s encouraging.
(2) It’s one thing to maintain a constant level of stupidity while other things remain constant. It’s something else to do so while other things (nuclear weapons, growing population and cological devastation, global warming etc) get worse.
Consumatopia 12.07.06 at 3:09 pm
cological devastation
I don’t know what that is but it scares the shit out of me.
CJColucci 12.07.06 at 4:39 pm
It might have something to do with eating too much German food.
Ken Houghton 12.08.06 at 12:59 am
Jack of Diamonds, Queen of Spades, Orangemen ban Germans.
The next trilogy from Brother Orson (blindref here), detailing the heroism inherent in conducting War on the Home Front as if it were a video game with carricatures, instead of a life- and economy-destroying event.
mds 12.08.06 at 2:52 pm
And on the other side of the Atlantic we had Windsor (Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) and Mountbatten (Battenberg).
That’s why I refer to the Prince of Wales as Charles Battenberg-Saxe-Coburg und Gotha. When I’m not calling his entire family usurpers. Franz Herzog von Bayern is the rightful King of England and Scotland. Join me in raising a glass to the King across the water. All right, I’m in North America, so they’re both across the water. My point, whatever it is, remains.
Jim S. 12.08.06 at 3:45 pm
A, sorry to rain on some people’s parade:
The proposal to declare war upon Germany was made by President Wilson on April 2. The actual declaration of war was made on April 6.
By an overwhelming majority of both houses. The “considerable opposition” does not really hold up, particularly to anyone who remembers the Anti-Vietnam war movement.
This is not to support any “Liberty Cabbage” nonsense, but one can support the war (vide Fritz Fischer) without going into hysterics.
SamChevre 12.08.06 at 4:10 pm
“Over the water”, mds, “over the water”. It’s much more ambiguous that way, and ambiguous is important.
Comments on this entry are closed.