by Henry Farrell on April 3, 2010
Let me propose that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aad38/aad38c9d03ecafb0c76b76517a756529f6239780" alt="ipad1"
is to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faa2b/faa2be0dc9c6751491055651720a40b5ecc530da" alt="ipad4"
as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6f79/c6f790638a65f797bb2d97d8fe3fb869df122f13" alt="ipad2"
is to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df90d/df90d9fa48334ef001d3045272e1b284c9a3b37f" alt="ipad3"
More seriously – do people seriously see a use for the iPad? For me, most of its pluses are minuses. If I want to read stuff, I _vastly prefer_ the zero animation just the plain text ma’am approach of your average e-book reader, to the hideous advertisements that I am sure will be bouncing from every page on the average iPad read (you think you’ll be able to download an AdBlock equivalent? think again). About the only positive thing I can say in the iPad’s favor is that it doesn’t do Flash.
by Daniel on April 3, 2010
Making a change from the usual run of the genre (ie, books about the “financial crisis” by people who didn’t tell you that there was a bubble while it was going on, but who nevertheless expect you to be interested in what they have to say about it now that it’s been and gone). A book about the bubble in the US, written by someone who was absolutely right about it, provably, ahead of time and in writing, and who is a lot more angry about the whole mess than those authors who just regard it as a great big game in which some entertaining characters made money at the expense of their dumb counterparties. Despite the comparatively microscopic size of his promotional budgets, I think Baker might have caught the spirit of the times a bit better than Andrew Ross Sorkin or Michael Lewis[1].
[click to continue…]