Games

by John Holbo on July 10, 2017

Why do people say Putin is playing chess and Trump is playing checkers when it is obvious Putin is playing poker and Trump is playing Calvinball?

Congressional Republicans, meanwhile, are playing Jenga plus Hungry Hungry Hippos. (The object is to eliminate critical structures and foundations without having them collapse on your turn. And you have to feed the hippos.) What game would you say Democrats are playing? Animal Crossing? Clue? Fix-It Felix Jr.?

{ 66 comments }

1

Adam Hammond 07.10.17 at 6:24 pm

Clue. Just trying to figure out who to blame.

2

Anarcissie 07.10.17 at 6:28 pm

What kind of poker? Reckless showboating like Texas Hold’em, or long-drawn-out strategic contests like classical Draw? I would have said ‘Chess, playing black’ of Putin. The US does something aggressive and hostile, like expanding NATO, encouraging Georgia to attack Russia, provoking and maybe assisting a coup in Ukraine, trying to get at the Tartus naval base by encouraging civil war in Syria; and Putin responds, usually pretty conservatively, taking what he needs and leaving the rest. That’s so far — a really dumb move by the US may tempt Putin to go on the offensive.

As for the Democratic Party establishment, I’d say after they bestirred themselves enough to capture ‘The Resistance’, they have gone back to sleep. Thus, they may be said to be playing Possum. But sincerely. I don’t consider concocting fables about Russian spies and saboteurs to be serious politics.

3

pseudo-gorgias 07.10.17 at 6:32 pm

dolls. totally lost in their own imaginations.

4

nastywoman 07.10.17 at 6:57 pm

”What game would you say Democrats are playing?”

”Nomic”?

”Nomic is a game created in 1982 by philosopher Peter Suber in which the rules of the game include mechanisms for the players to change those rules, usually beginning through a system of democratic voting.

Nomic is a game in which changing the rules is a move. In that respect it differs from almost every other game. The primary activity of Nomic is proposing changes in the rules, debating the wisdom of changing them in that way, voting on the changes, deciding what can and cannot be done afterwards, and doing it. Even this core of the game, of course, can be changed.

— Peter Suber, The Paradox of Self-Amendment”

5

TheSophist 07.10.17 at 7:47 pm

I was talking with Garry Kasparov about this a few weeks ago. (You have no idea how much fun that was!) Garry was saying that he hates the “x is playing chess” analogy most of the time that it is used, because chess is a game of perfect information – the moves are all there, waiting to be found and nothing is hidden from view.

I don’t think trump is playing calvinball. Calvin knows the rules, Trump only thinks he does.

The dems are hoping that they’re playing Clue. “Jared in Trump Tower with the oligarch”. The problem is that the republicans won’t let them win even if they figure it out.

6

CP Norris 07.10.17 at 8:15 pm

Democrats are playing golf. In which one tries to get the lowest score possible.

7

b9n10nt 07.10.17 at 8:51 pm

Democrats are always recklessly playing capture the flag as if there were no real consequences for them: they over-commit to getting power from the Republicans in the enemies own territory (without being tagged a leftist), meanwhile exposing their base to the other team’s depredations.

8

Heliopause 07.10.17 at 8:59 pm

Dems are playing the same games as everybody else and getting the results they desire (most of the time).

9

William Timberman 07.10.17 at 9:23 pm

Frogger.

10

Waiting for Godot 07.10.17 at 10:06 pm

“What game would you say Democrats are playing” Answer: tiddlywinks or hide and go seek.

11

nastywoman 07.10.17 at 10:07 pm

But I never believed the underlying ‘suggestion’ – that it is was the inability of Democrats to play ‘the game’ -(whatever ‘game’?) – ‘better’ than Trump – as ‘the winner’ in a Democratic Election or even in ‘the game’ between Putin and Trump get’s decided – not by some cards or ‘check mate’ – but by the spectators.
They decide who is ‘bluffing’ or ‘check mate’ – and if they want to turn a ‘complete and total loser’ – like Trump – into ‘the winner’ – so be IT!

Or in other words: It never was any Democrats who lost some ‘game’ – or would have a yuuge reason to find a new game – like somebody who played ‘Calvinball’ had the dumb luck – that a bunch of dumb spectators made him – what they think is – ‘the winner’ – while the rest of the world -(with a few exceptions) – knows that he actually has lost the game.

Or in what other (‘advanced’) country on earth could somebody like Trump be elected?
actually

12

nastywoman 07.10.17 at 10:33 pm

– or in other words – does it really matter what game they are playing – as it is the spectators -(the voters) – who decide who is ‘the winner’.

And the difference is just if the voters are -(for example) ‘French’ or ‘American’.

13

John Holbo 07.10.17 at 11:11 pm

I thought about suggesting Frogger myself!

14

Alan White 07.10.17 at 11:12 pm

To quote one of my favorite poets, Gary Snyder–who years ago in a conversation expressed his delight that I loved the poem containing this phrase, “Riprap”–the Dems are playing “an endless four-dimensional Game of Go”.

15

SC 07.10.17 at 11:19 pm

I was thinking GTA5 but a more accurate answer to “What game is Trump playing?” is, doh, he’s playing Trump: The Game. Trump said “I really like the game. It’s much more sophisticated than Monopoly, which I’ve played all my life.” Trump: The Game was, of course, a huge fail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump:_The_Game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdY31mDsBmU
https://www.hasbro.com/common/instruct/TrumptheGame.PDF (“Now that you are about to play my game, I invite you to live the fantasy! Feel the power! And, make the deals!”)

16

Orange Watch 07.11.17 at 12:54 am

I was going to suggest 52 Pickup for Trump (I agree with Sophist that Calvinball is too structured, and I’d add also too creative and collaborative), but I fear SC@15 nailed it. Definitely Trump: The Game.

17

bruce wilder 07.11.17 at 1:26 am

wait, . . . who said the democrats were still allowed to play?

18

Donald Johnson 07.11.17 at 1:29 am

Russian roulette.

19

Yan 07.11.17 at 2:04 am

The Trump is Calvin bit (which has appeared in a number of places, most entertainingly here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-in-calvin-and-hobbes-comic-strips-is-frighteningly-accurate_us_5783bbc1e4b01edea78eb57a) is interesting, since Calvin was long loved as a flawed but ultmimately heroic character embodying a fundamentally liberal ethos of nonconformity and sticking it to the man. What to make of his cultural conversion into an emblem of right wing evil?

20

RichardM 07.11.17 at 2:24 am

The Deimocrats aren’t playing a game. The Democrats have lost connection to the game server and are trying to reboot their cable modem. Meanwhile a simple scripted bot is running on the server, starting from their last known position and emulating their reactions in order to give the impression they are still playing.

21

BBA 07.11.17 at 2:54 am

As I’ve grown fond of saying, Trump does not play chess. He beats up the chess team and steals their lunch money.

22

someone 07.11.17 at 3:49 am

The democrats are playing football with Lucy.

23

JakeB 07.11.17 at 4:03 am

Remember that scene in the third season of Blackadder when the prince (a young Hugh Laurie) delightedly talks about how much fun playing cards is — “You try to give away your money as fast as you can!” That’s the game.

24

Pavel A 07.11.17 at 4:38 am

Everyone is playing chicken, albeit with different opponents.

25

NickUrfe 07.11.17 at 4:52 am

Democrats think they’re playing Clue! and Risk simultaneously, when they’re actually cheating at Pin the Tail on the Donkey – and still losing.

26

nastywoman 07.11.17 at 5:07 am

@15
”I invite you to live the fantasy! Feel the power! And, make the deals!”)

That’s it!

Trump invited the American people ‘to lose’ – and -(NOT the majority) accepted the invitation.

27

harry b 07.11.17 at 7:11 am

They’re all playing Mornington Crescent (though by some hitherto unrevealed convention, and with Moscow Avenue wild).

28

thatJim 07.11.17 at 8:44 am

I’m pretty sure it’s Go Fish.

29

Val 07.11.17 at 9:17 am

I think nastywoman is on to something. The Trumplicans are playing a game in which they get to change the rules, but the Democrats don’t. This is a definition of fascists I think – they don’t play by the rules, or they make rules up – because they are bullies.

Democrats, or democrats, have to play by the rules of democracy by definition. That’s their problem. I wish a lot of people here could stop siding with bullies and blaming the democrats for what’s happening. There is a lot of research though that says that’s what many people would rather do when they see bullying – side with the bullies/blame the victims.

30

Phil 07.11.17 at 9:45 am

I don’t think the Dems are playing Animal Crossing. I used to watch my daughter playing AC for hours on end (well, I didn’t watch for hours on end, that would be both creepy and very boring). When I asked her what was so great about it, she explained that you have a mortgage on a property, and to pay it you have to go to different places to work to earn money, and if you’ve got money over you can buy stuff for yourself, only in between times other characters ask you to do things for them, so then you have to go to other places and do those things as well. Why it’s never caught on with adult players I can’t imagine.

Anyway, AC would be far too constructive and outward-looking. I think they’re playing a variant of the ‘shopping list’ game, where each player has to repeat the list of items and add one to it…

“OK, I think Hillary lost
– because of Comey
– because of the New York Times
– because of Bernie, I mean obviously
– because of the Berniebros which is an issue in its own right
– because of sexism which obviously overlaps with the last one, but we did agree we could have this one
– because of the electoral college, I mean look at the popular vote…”

Hours of fun.

31

MFB 07.11.17 at 10:37 am

someone at 22 wins, in my opinion.

32

Lee A. Arnold 07.11.17 at 11:27 am

The Democrats and the Republicans are still playing “Monopoly”, and the Republicans just put a chintzy, gaudy, abandoned casino on “Boardwalk”.

2500 Boardwalk

33

soullite 07.11.17 at 11:53 am

I long ago came to the conclusion that the Democrats were deliberately ineffectual, mostly due to the way the EFCA was handled; that their actions are 80% conartistry. That’s why I support Trump. It’s unlikely he’ll do anything to help me, but the Democrats have been jerking me around since I became an adult, so it’s worth a shot.

They only thing the Democrats are playing here, is you.

The party of being deliberately ineffectual. They will never do any significant to help anyone economically, and will continue to use social ID issues to wank themselves about how damned ‘good’ and ‘liberal’ they are, and to paint the people who disagree with them about anything as ‘racist’ or ‘sexist’ (while creating a education and healthcare systems that provably disadvantage boys).

There’s a reason so many people turned to Trump. Nobody believes much in him. But we don’t believe in you at all. And hell, given that every single actor in this system with any kind of power is obviously terrified of Trump, well, that has to be good for people like me. The great and the mighty have been fucking us long enough–ruining our lives and justifying it to themselves by pointing to rising incomes in the third world (strange, though, that they themselves keep getting richer). If Trump makes them quake in their boots, he must be doing something right.

34

e julius drivingstorm 07.11.17 at 12:06 pm

Trump and the republicans play TEGWAR — the exciting game without any rules, from Bang the Drum Slowly.

The Dems think there are supposed to be rules. They play Go Fish.

35

nastywoman 07.11.17 at 12:28 pm

– and it completely mystifies me why there is still the focus on the Democrats Game?

I understand the question was:
”What are the Democrats playing” – but as the question -(subconsciously?) seems to imply that it is ‘the democrats’ who are playing an… unusual? or losing? game –
whassup with this hangup so long after the erection?

And isn’t this game some Russian are playing with a bunch of complete American Doofuses far, far more ‘entertaining’ – and that’s what counts in such a… a… how should we really define Whassup generally?

As for the less entertained world the game on the meta level already has been decided for ‘sanity’?

36

SusanC 07.11.17 at 1:12 pm

Illuminati? (From Steve Jackson Games)

At current state of play, the Democrats control Christopher Steele (ex British spook) who they use to control rogue elements in the Russian spy agencies (or did, until said rogue elements got prosecuted for treason). Trump on the other hand, has control of Putin and the non-rogue elements of the FSB (or possibly the other way round). Meanwhile, the Gnomes of Zurich…

37

SusanC 07.11.17 at 1:53 pm

Alternatively, it’s like the scene in The Deer Hunter where captured soldiers are forced to play Russian Roulette while people bet on it.

38

Fred W. Bacon 07.11.17 at 2:25 pm

I’m sorry, but Trump isn’t playing Calvinball. That is a fun games in which both players use their imaginations to gain an advantage. Trump is playing Fizzbin.

39

Dave Maier 07.11.17 at 3:20 pm

If Trump’s playing Calvinball, I can’t wait until he touches the Pernicious Poem Place.

40

nastywoman 07.11.17 at 3:31 pm

and soullite@33
I sooo – understand you –
as it feels just like yesterday – when in school this dude pretended that he makes ‘the man’ quake in ‘their boots’ and I thought too – ‘he must be doing something right’ –
and sooo I even pretended to date him – until he told me – that the whole ‘sticking it to the man thing’ was just for the lulz – and that he actually was working very heavily on becoming ‘the man’ too – and in order of becoming ‘the man’ he was even willing to go out with a girl called ‘Natalia Veselnitskaya’ – who was a total ‘loser’ and so I knew that the dude was a total loser – and completely useless to make me rich and famous – and so I became ‘a democrat’.

And there is something really cool with these ‘Democrats’ – they at least brush their teeth –
(what the lulzloser never did!)

only after I told him that me dating him was just ‘a game’ or favorite game

41

dilbert dogbert 07.11.17 at 5:02 pm

42

dilbert dogbert 07.11.17 at 5:20 pm

Re: Don Jr.
I don’t know what game he is playing but I have a couple of songs he might be playing.
Jailhouse Rock
I Fought The Law and the Law Won.

43

Name 07.11.17 at 5:41 pm

The Koch Party is playing Dance on Meth Thru the Claymores. (Power corrupts; power on meth…)
The Resistance is playing Perpetually-Belated Defense.

In whole, it looks like high camp, not a game.

44

Neville Morley 07.11.17 at 7:41 pm

Once again, I want a ‘like’ button.

At the risk of putting a jinx on the whole thing, or indeed the world, I fear we’re in the first round or so of Nuclear War.

45

lathrop 07.11.17 at 8:22 pm

And hell, given that every single actor in this system with any kind of power is obviously terrified of Trump, well, that has to be good for people like me.

This is silly — both premise and conclusion are laughable. Trump is visibly serving the interests of the right-wing rich and powerful; does that provide a hint regarding fantasy “people like you”?

Trump does seem to be a strong counterexample to any theory of rational voting.

46

nastywoman 07.11.17 at 9:03 pm

– and as I once said – you meet a lot of dudes like Trump Junior on Spring Break – and they always play the game: ‘Blöd’ – and the greatness of this game is – that it has a name in a ‘fureign language’ so they don’t even understand what they are – if one tells them:
You are sooo ‘blöd’ –
and then they ask: ‘What did you just say’? – and you always can say:
‘Ich sehe was was du nicht siehst’… and then they nod and say:
Aha!
You speak Swedish – so you must be ‘Swedish’?
And then you nod and say:
‘You are sooo blöd’!
– and then your mom -(or your dad) – comes by – very angry and tells you NOT to make fun of such good looking American Dudes – as they one day might become the American President and then they will try to take revenge for all the games we played with them…
of

47

basil 07.11.17 at 9:09 pm

And what game is CT’s boy Macron! playing?

48

Collin Street 07.11.17 at 9:22 pm

Or in what other (‘advanced’) country on earth could somebody like Trump be elected?

Pretty much any of them. Like I’ve set out many times, every person active on the hard right has obvious clinical cognitive problems, largely on the empathy-impairment spectrum [autism/narcissism/sociopathy]. Right-wing parties are often made up of a spectrum from “soft” to crypto- or not-so-crypto-fascists, but what often also happens is that the “soft” centrist/leftist/care-about-actual-people-and-the-gap-between-theory-and-reality flank collapses and you’re left with the hard right. Who are, from the above, entirely without exception severely impaired.

Since public perception of political parties lags the reality of the same political party… for a transitional period here you’re going to have a party made up entirely or near-entirely of severely disturbed and unfit people [theresa may, tony abbott] that nevertheless has the public credibility of its prior incarnation. In that case, during that period, you’re going to get public support for parties with leaders who resemble trump… or if not Trump’s specific problems, then some other equivalently-but-differently impaired person.

49

Ed 07.11.17 at 10:22 pm

They are playing basketball. The Democrats are the Washington Generals. The Republicans are the New York Knicks, who are terrible, but who are still better than the Washington Generals.

50

Underpaid Propagandist 07.12.17 at 2:00 am

33. Congratulations. You’re now a permanent parody feature on Wonkette. Keep the comedy flowing.

51

nastywoman 07.12.17 at 3:47 am

@48
‘Pretty much any of them.’

You mean ‘in your mind’? –
as there haven’t been any (‘advanced’) country lately which was insane enough to erect something like Trump.

52

nastywoman 07.12.17 at 3:53 am

@47
‘And what game is CT’s boy Macron! playing?’

On the 14th of July he will play the game:

‘Feed the ‘Trump’ with something it really doesn’t like to eat – at Jules Verne’…

53

David 07.12.17 at 7:40 am

Fluxx. (They’ve got good Keepers on the table; all they need is the right Goal.)

54

J-D 07.12.17 at 8:33 am

soullite

I long ago came to the conclusion that the Democrats were deliberately ineffectual …

I am not disposed to adopt that conclusion; and discovering that you came to it long ago does not change my mind. You announce the conclusion you came to long ago as if that should count for something with the people who read your remark; I can’t imagine why.

There’s a reason so many people turned to Trump.

You announce this as if it was an important point to make to readers who imagine that people turned to Trump for no reason. Obviously the people who voted for Trump had reasons for doing so (although not necessarily good ones); equally, the people who voted for Clinton, or for third-party candidates, or not at all, also had reasons for their choices (although not necessarily good ones). It is unlikely that all the people who voted for Trump did so for the same reason. Perhaps you are imagining that everybody who did what you did acted for the same reasons; that would be unwise.

And hell, given that every single actor in this system with any kind of power is obviously terrified of Trump, well, that has to be good for people like me. The great and the mighty have been fucking us long enough–ruining our lives and justifying it to themselves by pointing to rising incomes in the third world (strange, though, that they themselves keep getting richer). If Trump makes them quake in their boots, he must be doing something right.

I suppose this is something else you would like to imagine, that Trump scares powerful people. I don’t know what evidence you imagine supports that conclusion. I know there are people without power who have been explicit about how Trump scares them.

55

Z 07.12.17 at 8:57 am

You mean ‘in your mind’? –
as there haven’t been any (‘advanced’) country lately which was insane enough to erect something like Trump.

It all depends on what you mean by “something like”, but I would nominate France electing Sarkozy in 2007 and Italy electing Berlusconi in 2008 as relatively uncontroversial examples. In no particular order
-Demonization of foreigners and blatant appeal to racism. Check.
-Sycophantic love for wealth and cynical disregard of the poor. Check.
-Total and permanent corruption. Check.
-Obvious narcissism with a preference for lies and mediocrity. Check.
-Outrageous nepotism and favoritism. Check.
Etc.

56

MFB 07.12.17 at 12:44 pm

Abe in Japan seems remarkably Trumpian, with a dash of Tojo.
Tener in Brazil has a lot of Trumpesque qualities, though admittedly he was installed by coup rather than elected.
I don’t know if nastywoman considers Africans advanced enough, but Zuma was Trumpesque before anyone knew there was going to be a Trump — and now we look set to get an actual billionaire gangster, Ramaphosa, to replace him!
It seems to me that if you have no alternative (and loads of Americans didn’t deem Clinton an alternative) then you have to vote for what you get, even if it wears an odious orange wig and is even more incompetent than its predecessor.

57

nastywoman 07.12.17 at 2:20 pm

”It all depends on what you mean by “something like”, but I would nominate France electing Sarkozy in 2007 and Italy electing Berlusconi in 2008 as relatively uncontroversial examples.”

You point to the problem how much (some) ‘spectators’ -(mostly Americans?) – have completely lost their ability to critical differentiate between politicians -(not only their own) but even between whole countries – Like:
‘Obama is just like Bush’ –
or:
‘They – (Europeans Countries) – are all ‘neoliberal’.

NO they are NOT! –
and to compare Sarkozy to Trump and Trump to Berlusconi -(because of his corruption and Bunga-Bunga?) is… may I say: ‘really delusional’? – or joking just like comparing:
‘A doofus idiotic Entertainer’ to – Hitler?

And the ‘checks’ you presented say it all – as every single one of them – are so much more blown out of proportion and much more ‘bigly’ and ‘greater’ in Trumps case – that even a Berlusconi -(who tried hard) – looks in comparison like the ‘smallest’ and most irrelevant ‘apprentice’.

Or to say it in a ‘positivistic Trumpish’ way:
Nobody does it more beautiful THAN I – ME – TRUMP!!!
Nobody does the whole deal more extreme than my homeland –
THE ALMIGHTY US of A(ll).
WE ARE THE GREATEST – THE WINNERS -(in every ‘check’ you came up with —
-(and these poor ‘little’ Europeans with their tiny, tiny little efforts to – for example ‘demonizing foreigners’ while they at the same time even have laws against ‘hate-speech’) and their ‘Sycophanti love for wealth and cynical disregard of the poor’ is very effectivly countered by a social net and welfare policies US can only dream about….
and so on and on…
And it still could be better! –
But it’s the amazing difference between somebody – who for example believes – in a European Health Care System -(to name just one of the many radical differences between a Trump and a Sarkozy and a Berlusconi) – should be taken in account…?
Don’t y’a think?

58

politicalfootball 07.12.17 at 6:07 pm

Whatever game the Dems are playing, the refs are on the other side.

59

Guy Harris 07.12.17 at 6:57 pm

nastywoman:

You point to the problem how much (some) ‘spectators’ -(mostly Americans?) – have completely lost their ability to critical differentiate between politicians -(not only their own)

If you’re accusing Z of being one of those spectators, it’s definitely “mostly” in “mostly Americans?”, given that Z is French (so Sarkozy would be one of “[his] own”, and Trump wouldn’t be one of “[his] own”, here).

60

J-D 07.12.17 at 7:41 pm

Are the US and Russia not still playing Twilight Struggle?

61

Collin Street 07.13.17 at 2:11 am

@nastywoman.
I gave you two names, prime ministers of G20 nations with obvious clinical problems rendering them fundamentally incapable of independant living, who are nevertheless unremarkable in their party rooms. Trump is not uniquely impaired.

62

Sebastian H 07.13.17 at 4:54 am

I’m pretty sure Z wasn’t suggesting that other leaders were just like Trump in every particular. That would be weird, as they come from other countries with somewhat other social pathologies.

But he showed examples in the corrupt and obviously unfit to lead vein just fine. Its true that Trump does that hugely.

63

Mike Spencer 07.13.17 at 8:43 am

Democrats are playing a rigged game.

64

rea 07.13.17 at 1:33 pm

Well, he isn’t PM (yet), but surely the resemblances between Boris Johnson and Trump (even apart from the physical ) are remarkable.

65

Anarcissie 07.13.17 at 1:50 pm

@58, @63 — ‘Possum’ does not require rigging or suborned refs.

66

Taj 07.13.17 at 3:08 pm

> And hell, given that every single actor in this system with any kind of power is obviously terrified of Trump, well, that has to be good for people like me.

So who are these all-powerful people who were sitting pretty before Trump and are quaking in their boots now? No don’t answer that, I’m being facetious. There are none. Their only concern before the election was how many miles they could ride Trump like a little pony before he collapsed, and their only remaining one now is how much Trump’s implosion might affect their timelines. “People like me” are the only ones who should be terrified.

Comments on this entry are closed.