One of the challenges critics of our contemporary form of capitalism face, is how to make the analysis of that beast clear to a broad audience. Let’s face it, most academic books on the topic are hard to understand. Moreover, many people hardly ever read a non-fiction book about politics, let alone the economy. Film is in this respect a great medium, since it is easier to digest than reading a book. And often a picture says more than a thousand words.
Some years ago, I was teaching ‘ethics of capitalism’ to an interdisciplinary group of undergraduate students. Many of them had never had any economics, and since any third-year student could take this course, I had students in that class from all over the university – history, philosophy, economics, geography, anthropology, sociology – even a student from theoretical physics. In the last week of the course, we zoomed in on the financial crisis, and I was worried how to teach such complex material. So, in addition to giving a lecture, I also organised a screening and discussion of Inside Job, and that worked very well. The film was pretty effective to further process the dry material from the lecture, and put all of it into a broader perspective.
I was reminded of this great use of a documentary to help us understand our economic system, when I recently saw the documentary The American Dream and Other Fairy Tales, which was released last year. From what I understand, it’s been shown only in a number of limited places in the USA and at filmfestivals, and is only available for rent in North-America; I got access to the film via a link because I interviewed Abigail Disney for the book I’m writing.
In this film, Abigail Disney tells the story of how the Disney company changed since her grandfather (Roy Disney) and her great-uncle (Walt Disney) started the company. It tells the story of workers at Disneyland in Anaheim, California, who work full time jobs and still cannot make ends meet, because the wages they are paid are well below the living wage.
This poverty does not remain some abstract fact, but is given a human face. The film tells the story of four of the workers who are trying to make ends meet: the couple Ralph and Trina, who are in their 40s/50s and have three kids, and who have been working at Disney for more than 10 years; Artemis, who has been working at Disney for 8 years; and Ellie, a 26 year old woman who has two jobs, including one at Disney. None of them can afford to live on their own in stable housing. Ralph and Trina live with their kids at the house of Trina’s mother; Artemis moves from one temporary place to the next; and Ellie is still living with her parents, even though she would like move out. With the pay they earn as full-time Disney workers, they cannot stay out of poverty and lead a modest middle class family life.
Leading a modest middle class family life as a Disney worker was possible in the 1950’s, 60s and 70s. And inequality in the company was considerably more limited. In 1967, Roy Disney’s pay, including stock options, was 78 times his lowest worker’s pay, which was typical for a CEO at that time. In 2018, Disney’s CEO earned 2000 times the salary of a Disney custodian.
One of the things that struck me most seeing this film, was how well the movie succeeded in giving a dignified picture of Trina and Ralph, Ellie, and Artemis – portraying them in a very respectful way, yet at the same time showing their vulnerability because the company, and more generally the economic system, is failing them. So often in public discourse the poor and vulnerable are portrayed in a less respectful way, sometimes also depicting them as responsible for their own failures; this movie does precisely the opposite, and shows strong people who are not giving up, despite being utterly squeezed by those who decide on their working and hence living conditions. And this the story of very many American workers.
In addition to the stories of Ralph and Trina, Ellie, and Artemis, a number of writers and scholars are interviewed who help to put the story of Disneyland in a broader context – the changes in the American Economy (labour market, government regulation, etc.) since the 1970s till today. There is some discussion of the shift to free market thinking with some really crazy footage of Milton Friedman normalising the idea that everyone is purely pursuing their own interest in society. For Abigail Disney the film is also personal, since she is part of the Disney family, shares in the family fortune, and is convinced that her grandfather would be appalled by the current situation. But it is at the same time the story of American capitalism over the last 75 years – and, in some respects also of other capitalist economies (though economic inequality as well as pay gaps in the US certainly trump those in Europe).
I am convinced that we need an entire arsenal of means and methods to debate what is happening to economic inequality, what is causing it, what it does to ordinary people, and what role our prejudices play in implicitly accepting the current state of affairs (for example, racial or class prejudices, or prejudices about unions). One of the reasons I’m very glad we still have Crooked Timber (despite its ups and downs), is that truly independent public spaces are needed to discuss these matters, and to learn from each other. But books, blogs, and newspapers need to be supplemented with other media – and films that tell a moving story, and that make us think, are one of those means. If we want to reclaim a less inegalitarian economic system and a fair social contract, we should of course organise, but also in terms of debate and persuasion frappez, toujours frappez. We should keep talking about what is happening to the most vulnerable under capitalism, and how come inequalities have exploded. The American Dream and Other Fairy Tales does precisely that, and with its focus on Disney in a unique way.
{ 14 comments }
Ingrid Robeyns 01.11.23 at 1:29 pm
trollers can spare themselves the time of spewing poison; such comments go straight into the bin.
PatinIowa 01.11.23 at 5:39 pm
This is pure anecdote, so take it as such.
In the late 70s, I was making my living tending bar. One of the people who trained me had worked at Disney world, where he met his wife. One day, out to dinner with them, I asked what it was like.
“I’ve been working in the restaurant business for ten plus years, and it was by far the worst place I’ve ever worked.”
“They treat their employees like shit. They simply assume we were looking to steal anything not nailed down.”
“A living hell.”
“We quit and moved back here to Indianapolis.”
As you say, it’s capitalism, or at least our version of it, not Roy and Walt.
Gareth Wilson 01.11.23 at 9:11 pm
“In this film, Abigail Disney tells the story of how the Disney company changed since her grandfather (Roy Disney) and her great-uncle (Walt Disney) started the company. ”
“Leading a modest middle class family life as a Disney worker was possible in the 1950’s, 60s and 70s. And inequality in the company was considerably more limited. In 1967, Roy Disney’s pay, including stock options, was 78 times his lowest worker’s pay, which was typical for a CEO at that time.”
“the changes in the American Economy (labour market, government regulation, etc.) since the 1950s till today. ”
Just going by your review, I can see an obvious problem. Can you see it too?
nastywoman 01.12.23 at 1:26 am
THE AMERICAN DREAM – is a Film which ran on ARD German TV 37 years ago with an exceptional ‘winning’ audience of over 35 percent ‘Einschaltquote’ – and just like Abigail Disney’s Documentary it also featured four Angeleno’s – who explained – while driving through LA – how to get rich and/or famous in America.
https://youtu.be/fX53vT0GNtY
And so – already in 1986 the Dream started with some… somber words:
‘Welcome to Playland. A ride on the carrousel is only 50 cents and for every win there are only a few losing tickets. But for every GREAT prize a lot of losers have to pay – as it is the law of the players: Only where there are a lot of losers – there will be the biggest winners –and quite astonishing – these words were not only followed by a reference to Disneyland –
later in the Film – but the director and author of the old production – later in his life also became an Executive Producer of Disney Programming in Germany AND he currently is interviewing the survivors of the shoot of 1986.
So –
what will they tell him – after the Realtor had such a hard time – Angel Salazar’s claim to fame has become the role of Chi Chi in Scarface – the Drug Dealer got caught and after some time in prison became a very successful Car Dealer and the Asian-Mexican Lifeguard lived happy ever after the old – fashioned stereotypical American Dream?
What role will their live experiences and their prejudices -(if they had some) play in implicitly accepting the current state of affairs?
nastywoman 01.12.23 at 8:35 am
and the problem is – that (still) too many Americans -(and even too many Europeans) prefer a system where the Dream of becoming Rich and Famous is the most read Fairy Tale.
nastywoman 01.12.23 at 10:02 am
but on the other hand –
a European -(and especially a Swiss) understands very well – that it is a excellent idea to limit the pay of a CEO to 12 Times the salary of his lowest payed worker –
BUT! –
a lot of Americans -(and Brits?) have a MAJOR problem with this very ‘social’ concept – and the reason –
as we have found out –
isn’t as ‘political’ -(as very few Americans really enjoy ‘politics’) – as it is the ‘cultural attitude that a lot of Americans just enjoy ‘the jungle’ and even get really HIGH on it.
AND as American Führers still influence the people of the World to such an amazing dimension that even in Brazil they mimic ‘The Art of the Deal’ we really need to change
(culturally) the ending of the old American Dreamy Fairy Tale –
FIRST –
in order to get rid of the Nightmare Inequality.
(and perhaps don’t use the word ‘Capitalism’ as much and substitute it with the words: The Rich Mans GREED)
Ingrid Robeyns 01.12.23 at 10:27 am
Gareth – thanks for being such a careful reader! This is entirely my mistake. the Film uses 1971 as the year that things started changing, though I know that historial of science and politics have debates about this. Often (at least in Europe) we say ‘the late 1970s’ to indicate when neoliberalism (or whatever word one chooses) started to kick in (but as we know the ideological basis for that was prepared much, much earlier).
I’ll correct it in the OP – but thanks again for catching this.
Gareth Wilson 01.12.23 at 5:59 pm
No problem. Of course, how life has changed for the average American worker since 1923, when Roy and Walt Disney started the company, is also an interesting story.
nastywoman 01.12.23 at 11:20 pm
@how life has changed for the average American worker since 1923, when Roy and Walt Disney started the company, is also an interesting story.
sure –
BUT the utmost interesting current economical story is:
‘what is happening to economic inequality, what is causing it, what it does to ordinary people, and what role our prejudices play in implicitly accepting the current state of affairs (for example, racial or class prejudices, or prejudices about unions)’ and from a blog like CT I expected to already read lots and lots of comments on this thread –
Whassup?
Bitte mehr Interesse meine Herren!
Z 01.13.23 at 5:49 am
Help out a layperson Prof. Robeyns: can you recommend any literature that explains this further? I am more interested in material that focuses more on why a full time job no longer means a modest middle class lifestyle (or a decent job no longer means being able to buy a house and save for retirement) than why rich people got richer, if possible. I am currently a student and have access to academic resources.
engels 01.13.23 at 1:30 pm
Agree with this, especially the final paragraph. Otoh they did lift the infamous employee beard ban so perhaps Disneyland is a microcosm of wider changes: extreme economic regression alongside limited cultural progress.
engels 01.13.23 at 5:31 pm
can you recommend any literature that explains… why a full time job no longer means a modest middle class lifestyle
Hth
Ingrid Robeyns 01.13.23 at 8:32 pm
Z @ 10 – I am not sure whether I understand your question properly, but I would think that most of the contemporary academic literature on the changing nature of capitalism contributes to this explanation (and that literature is vast!). Importantly, in my understanding “how a full time jobs no longer allows for a middle class lifestyle” and “why the rich got richer” are two sides of the same coin: the wages of workers have hardly increased (and in the US in real terms decreased) while those at the top have incresed. In most countries neoliberalism/market fundamentalism has led to a decline of the welfare state (there is an entire literature focussing on that), and the tax burden has shifted from ‘capital’ to ‘labour’, meaning that those who have only income from work are relatively in a worse position.
On overal rising economic inequalities, the work by welfare economists like Thomas Piketty should be informative; though I think the book by Anthony Atkinson, ‘Inequality: what can be done?” might be easier to start with (assuming that’s what you need?) (https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674979789) If you are interested in the analysis specifically for the US, then perhaps “Saving capitalism: for the many, not the few’, by Rob Reich is an accessible place to start? But there are many other books to read, these are just some that come to mind.
nastywoman 01.13.23 at 10:09 pm
@10
‘I am more interested in material that focuses more on why a full time job no longer means a modest middle class lifestyle’
@everything what Prof. Robeyns suggests + let’s never forget – for ‘a modest middle class lifestyle’ you need ‘modest middle class jobs’ and Predominant Consumer Countries or shall we call them ‘Service Economies’ don’t have these jobs anymore – as they are a lot like Disneyland – with a majority of low payed ‘Servers’ – just servicing anybody who still can afford to joyfully Mickey Mouse around.
Comments on this entry are closed.