Incoming!

by Maria on July 11, 2006

When I heard Jonathan Edelstein, aka the Head Heeb, had been to Ireland recently and was planning to write something about it, I knew we’d be in for a treat. Today he’s posted a very informative piece on immigration in Ireland. It’s a good overview from someone who has a lot of comparative knowledge about immigration and can place our experience in a wider context. From being a net exporter of people up to 1995, we’ve been an immigration nation since, with 10% of people living in Ireland today born elsewhere. And it’s only getting started.

The biggest group of immigrants to Ireland are nationals of the new EU member states. As Ireland (and also the UK and Sweden) chose to open its borders to the new member state worker from their accession in May 2004, we’ve seen a great influx of people from central and eastern Europe and the Baltic states, much to the benefit of our economy and our society as a whole. Since 2004, 200,000 social security numbers have been issued to non-nationals; 110,000 to Poles, 30,000 to Lithuanians, and 15,000 to Latvians. Looking at non-nationals as a whole, the top seven goes like this; Poland, China, Lithuania, Latvia, Nigeria (down from 3rd place in 2002), UK, US. As Jonathan points out, Ireland’s lack of colonies means there’s no historic logic linking us with most of our immigrant communities. Immigration to Ireland is largely determined by the incentives and opportunities of our immigration policy and our economy.

In Ireland, the infamous ‘Polish plumber’ (or, more like, the ‘Polish builder’) is a fairly popular figure. Our economic growth is precariously dependent on a booming building sector. Irish builders have concentrated on the big construction projects, often turning up their noses at smaller SSIA fueled house extensions. Several friends of mine have had building work done in the last year; each of them has a well-thumbed Polish dictionary and an impressive command of construction vocabulary in that language.

It’s not all plain sailing. In 2003, our Supreme Court ruled that while babies born in Ireland are entitled to citizenship, their parents don’t have the same automatic entitlement. This came at a time when Dublin’s three maternity hospitals were in crisis because of the number of non-EU nationals arriving in the late stages of pregnancy (sometimes disembarking already in labour) and giving birth in Ireland in order to secure citizenship. It was reckoned that one in three births in Dublin were to non-nationals, often Nigerian women who left the country soon afterwards, Irish birth certificates in hand. There was consternation when a Kenyan woman gave birth in the office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, having arrived in the country several hours earlier. Ireland seemed to be in a minority of EU countries that determine citizenship by birth. In 2004, a referendum approved by a surprisingly large majority a change to our constitution which did away with the birth right to citizenship.

I don’t know what the effect of this has been on immigration patterns. Jonathan Edelstein seems to think we have a relatively benign immigration policy. That’s good to hear. While we don’t operate national quotas, we’re certainly moving towards the ‘green card’ model of allowing immigrants with particularly useful backgrounds to emigrate to Ireland. Our last census was in 2002, so figures on immigration are based on slightly rough and ready calculations of social security numbers issued to non-nationals. A census later this year will give us a clearer idea of what the numbers really are and also help to develop sound policies for dealing with the influx.

In the future, we may even have to work at attracting the most ambitious and able immigrants from central and eastern Europe and the Baltic states. Other EU countries have taken note of the positive effects these talented people have had in our economy, and are even considering bringing forward their own admission of new member state nationals. Strong competition will come as the Baltics’ own revving economies scoop up their brightest and best as they whizz past us.

{ 14 comments }

1

carnegie 07.11.06 at 12:36 pm

The census took place in April of this year.

2

pedant 07.11.06 at 1:50 pm

… useful backgrounds to emigrate to Ireland

Nope.

… useful backgrounds to immigrate to Ireland.

3

P O'Neill 07.11.06 at 1:51 pm

It’s an interesting case to analyze. A small country with open borders can see very large proportional changes very quickly. The anecdotal evidence is more negative than the apparent ease of absorption might suggest. Many stories about the summer job market for students having evaporated because the jobs are going to Poles or Latvians. There also seem to be a disproportionate number of the latter nationalities involved in Ireland’s already high rate of road accidents, although that may reflect the age composition of immigrants as well. I think the new census results will be ready quite soon so firmer numbers may be available shortly.

4

Matt 07.11.06 at 2:25 pm

Maria,
Do those source of immigrant breakdowns include those who were of Irish families and so able to claim citizenship in this way? Or is that rule still around? (My understanding was that for some time at least those w/ enough Irish grandparents could claim Irish citizenship fairly easily, in an attempt to lure back the diaspora. Is that still so, and if so, are these people figured in? Surely they should be, since there’s often as not nothing particularly Irish about someone who’s great grandparents came over during the patato famine.)

5

Cian O'Connor 07.11.06 at 2:31 pm

You have to have one grandparent who was Irish. Anyone who had grand-parents who were alive in the potato famine will be pretty old…

6

Jonathan Edelstein 07.11.06 at 2:47 pm

Ireland seemed to be in a minority of EU countries that determine citizenship by birth.

I’m actually pretty sure that, by that time, Ireland was the only remaining EU country with pure ius solis citizenship. The ius solis was a common-law concept that the UK passed on to Ireland and many of its overseas colonies, while civil law countries (with the partial exception of France) tended to favor ius sanguinis. Most of the countries that once had pure ius solis have since modified it, with the UK doing so in the early 1980s and Ireland being the last European holdout. Even Australia and NZ have enacted changes similar to Ireland’s.

Our last census was in 2002, so figures on immigration are based on slightly rough and ready calculations of social security numbers issued to non-nationals.

The Central Statistics Office publishes annual migration data; this is for 2005.

7

Gene O'Grady 07.11.06 at 3:57 pm

Isn’t the phrase “ius soli?” “Ius solis” would have to do with the sun, which would cover everyone.

For what it’s worth, my only Irish ancestor emigrated to Canada before the potato famine, and I am only amused at my relatives (at least the American ones) who parade their putative Irishness. My wife, of Norwegian and German ancestry, is even more amused by the people who say things like “I could just tell you’re Irish by looking at you.”

8

Matt 07.11.06 at 4:19 pm

Thanks for the info Cian. I suppose that having one Irish grandparent still only makes one Irish if you’ve got a pretty strong sense of the power of blood.

Removing birthright citizenship is a good way to have the problems of a perpetual non-member class rightly criticized by Walzer and others, I think, and tends also to be closely related to pretty unpleasent nativist tendicies. The way to deal with problem cases is to not give visas to people who seem to be seeking only to have children on the soil of such countries and to not give immigration benefits to the parents of minor children in most cases, and then not to get hysterical when some cases slip by.

9

Jonathan Edelstein 07.11.06 at 5:19 pm

Isn’t the phrase “ius soli?”

Probably so; my Latin isn’t what it ought to be.

10

Tim Worstall 07.12.06 at 4:26 am

The one grandparent thing is also “one grandparent born on the island of Ireland”. My brother picked up his Irish passport a few years ago (following problems with his UK one and the US INS) on the basis of one grandmother from County Down. No need to be Eire, just the island of Ireland.

11

nick s 07.12.06 at 5:07 am

I suppose that having one Irish grandparent still only makes one Irish if you’ve got a pretty strong sense of the power of blood.

Surely Jack Charlton’s attitude to what constituted an Irish footballer was a forerunner to what constitutes an Irish bricklayer?

12

dearieme 07.12.06 at 5:51 am

“if you’ve got a pretty strong sense of the power of blood”. WHAT?

13

DC 07.12.06 at 11:08 am

“Anyone who had grand-parents who were alive in the potato famine will be pretty old…”

I’m not so sure. I’m the youngest in my family, and my mother is the youngest in hers, so my maternal grandfather (who died before I was born) was born 88 years for me. If I were turning 71 this year (i.e. if I were born in 1935) my grandfather would have been born in Black ’47, so to speak. 71 is, I suppose, pretty old, but not ancient.

14

Maria 07.12.06 at 1:01 pm

Oops. Thanks, Carnegie. I guess it’s too late for me to fill in that form. Pity – I was even home during April and might have been counted.

And grudging, irritated thanks to Pedant.

Comments on this entry are closed.