Esten

by Ingrid Robeyns on December 7, 2006

One the day my child turned one, “TRex”:http://www.firedoglake.com/index.php?author=35 wrote about “Esten”:http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/06/late-nite-fdl-for-esten/, a three year old boy with leukemia, asking his readers to donate money for his treatment.

I am surprised about my increasing inability to read posts about children in pain, or children in miserable circumstances, without producing tears. Is it age? Or is it triggered by a growing awareness of how vulnerable children can be? Or a permanent change in my hormonal balanance due to childbearing or breastfeeding? Or is it the psychological effects of motherhood?

Whatever…. Hang in there, Esten!

{ 24 comments }

1

rea 12.07.06 at 9:47 am

“a permanent change in my hormonal balance due to childbearing or breastfeeding . . . the psychological effects of motherhood”

Can’t be either of those, since I feel the same way since I’ve started getting involved in raising kids, and I’m a guy.

2

Nix 12.07.06 at 10:21 am

Blame biology. I’ve started feeling that sort of thing merely as a side-effect of aging above about 25ish, without children or any prospect of same.

3

David 12.07.06 at 10:33 am

I feel the same way about such things. A friend of my son’s (age 12) has been coping with a nasty brain cancer for the past couple of years — several surgeries and brutal chemotherapies that wrack his body and appearance. It’s all I can do to keep it together when he’s visiting my son.

4

Steve LaBonne 12.07.06 at 10:51 am

I’ve been that way since my daughter (now 14) waw born. I was actually a bit worse when she was younger. I couldn’t, for example, listen at all to Mahler’s “Kindertotenlieder”, which I can manage now. I do think having a child arrive in one’s life can bring a permanently heightened realization of just how vulnerable children are- and of just how devastated one would be if anything happened to one’s own (which gives one increased empathy for other parents and children).

5

Grand Moff Texan 12.07.06 at 11:31 am

I’ll second rea’s emotion: ever since I became a father, my protectiveness instinct isn’t just limited to my daughter.
.

6

Maria 12.07.06 at 12:12 pm

I expect parents have an even more heightened sensitivity, but I do also think it’s a function of age. I can’t be dealing with these sorts of things since my mid 20s – the hormones kick in even if you don’t have your own kids. Or maybe it’s just that we feel the pain of children in jeopardy as soon as awareness of our own mortality arrives post-adolescence.

7

Natalie Solent 12.07.06 at 1:12 pm

I think a lot of people, male and female, are affected this way. At least I’ve got the reaction, “you, too?” whenever I’ve mentioned it at playgroups or the school gates.

I remember agreeing with my neighbour that even accounts of events centuries ago (for some reason Vikings taking children as slaves when they raided Britain had come up in conversation) that involved children being hurt upset us both in a way that they never had before we had children.

Explanations? – all yours seem plausible to me, but your second one seems most likely.

8

rea 12.07.06 at 1:33 pm

“Explanations?”

I think it’s simply a matter of it being easier to have empathy for the familiar rather than the strange–every hurt child is somehow my Juan and Crystal, nowdays, while before I had kids in my life, a hurt child was distressing but in a theoretical sort of way . . .

9

Alex Earl 12.07.06 at 1:49 pm

I’m not sure how related this is, but I don’t have children, yet I’ve found as I’ve gotten older that yes, the suffering of children, even implied, can at least cause me to well up a little.

Similarly, I’ve found that unlike when I was younger, I’m much more susceptible to cheap sentiment. I’ve found that even when I watch movie clips entirely out of context, if I hear a molodramatic string section, and say, a hearltfelt moment in a father son relationship, I’m quickly brought to tears.

This recently happened when I saw the tail end of finding nemo.

10

Daniel Nexon 12.07.06 at 2:39 pm

I’ve had the same reaction. In my case, the clearest difference comes when I teach my intermittent course on the politics of genocide. I used to maintain some distance from descriptions of mass slaughter and brutalization, but now I find teaching and reading relevant material far more emotionally wrenching.

11

Brian 12.07.06 at 3:46 pm

Well, I know of at least one study where the response to a crying infant were compared between men and women with and without children, and they were different – both between gender and child status. I can’t remember now how much physiology was done, and I can’t find it online. (I’m not where I have good library access right now)

If memory serves, though, there is some good biological data on this kind of thing. If anyone thinks I should find these and link to them or not bother commenting, I will make an effort to dig them up.

And Alex – I symphatise! I’ve had to watch Finding Nemo about 50 times in the last year, and it gets me every time.

12

Ray 12.07.06 at 3:59 pm

Another dad with a “me too!”
Interestingly, the completely irrational but nonetheless intense bursts of fear I started getting when my son was born disappeared completely after my daughter was born. A friend reported the same thing. The head space just isn’t available any more.

13

ingrid 12.07.06 at 4:29 pm

brian, I would love to learn more about that study if you have time to dig it up (but of course you are welcome to say whatever you’d like to contribute without linking etc.) One problem with this kind of studies might be that one possible partial explanation for the differnece between parents and non-parents may be that people who are more sensitive are more likely to become parents (I wouldn’t support this hypothesis based on personal observations).

What would be really interesting, but I have never heard of anyone doing it, is to survey people (parents, non-parents, men, women etc.) on a regular basis, and from these longitudional data try to figure out whether parenthood really makes a difference in how sensitive one is to seeing the pain of others, or whether parenthood is correlated to something else that really triggers the tears.

I don’t know of any of such studies, but the comments in this section seems to suggest that both parental status and age matter (gender perhaps too, but since we don’t tend to change our gender over time, we don’t know from personal experience). Age might in fact be correlated to something else too – like going through the experience of losing important others. If that were true, then age itself would not be the factor, but certain important experiences in life.

14

Another Duncan 12.07.06 at 5:24 pm

I don’t have kids and I’m a guy and I find it harder to deal with suffering in children. When I first read “The Wasp Factory” at 18 I thought it was an amusing book with a clever twist. Now at 35 I think it is appalling.

15

double-plus-ungood 12.07.06 at 7:31 pm

I think there’s some biological change that curses parents of both gender. I’ve been suffering from the guy version of the malady for twenty years now.

Before children, I would look at a story of parents who threw themselves into a well to save a child and consequently drowned and wonder “what the hell were they thinking? Theyhad no chance of getting the kid or themselves out.” Now I think “those poor saps, they had no choice.”

16

vivian 12.07.06 at 8:50 pm

I think having a child caused the most dramatic increase in my empathy for other kids, especially suffering ones. But it wasn’t the first or only increase – it’s kind of horrifying to think just how casual and intellectual I once was.
Sentimentality is related, but I think different, it’s influenced by lots of things, such as deliberate, studied attempts to make us all care about Nemo. At my most cynical I would tear up at movies sometimes, never at compelling ones, only embarrassingly formulaic ones.

17

Brian 12.07.06 at 9:28 pm

I’m looking – it will probably have to wait until tomorrow…

18

Nick Barnes 12.08.06 at 3:58 am

Oh, yes. It happened to me quite suddenly when my children were born, but based on some previous comments one wonders whether it’s a general effect among adults of a certain age, and is dramatically accelerated by parenthood.

19

Belle Waring 12.08.06 at 7:14 am

it happened to me while I was pregnant for the first time. I suddenly couldn’t watch wildlife shows where the mother giraffe has to abandon an unhealthy newborn, or hyenas get the baby widlebeest. I am now ripe for the most formulaic child in danger movie scenarios when I used to find them too transparently manipulative to be effective. also, I can barely read anything about the holocaust now. or in the gulag archipelago where the women prisoners are saving up sugar somehow to make a little christening cake! I better stop now or I’ll cry.

20

magistra 12.08.06 at 9:31 am

I wonder if it’s a recent historical phenomenon that people feel a sudden change in their emotions towards children’s suffering. After all, in the West, we’re now in one of the few historical periods in which many people can live a substantial part of their life without close contact with any children, let alone suffering children. In most other cultures, almost everyone would see children that they knew well dying young. Maybe it’s more strange (or at least historically unusual) to live in a world where you can regard Little Nell’s death as funny, because it’s unimaginable in real-life?

21

vivian 12.08.06 at 11:38 pm

Seems like someone should mention the CNET editor fellow about now… Can’t stop thinking about it.

22

jen 12.09.06 at 8:12 pm

I used to laugh at my mom & tell her she was being ridiculous for crying any time a missing kid report was on the news. I now, a year into motherhood myself, COMPLETELY GET IT. My husband watches “To Catch a Predator” with this sick fascination and I have to yell at him to change it because I get this awful anxiety bordering on nausea and he doesn’t understand why. Fatherhood hasn’t changed his sense of “but that could be OUR KID” at all, he’s still oblivious.

23

Anderson 12.10.06 at 2:59 pm

What Rea said. I’m the dad of a 2-year-old, and I had to put down Niall Ferguson’s War of the World a couple of times due to horrible things done to children in the Armenian & Jewish genocides.

But even before that, I’ve gotten more mawkish with age, in general & not just about kids. For years now, I tear up when Leia tells Han “I love you” and he replies, “I know.” Which sounds like a confession of aesthetic illiteracy, I guess.

24

Xanthippas 12.13.06 at 1:49 am

Are you kidding? As I’ve gotten older (and since I’ve had my own) I’ve found it impossible to read about kids in terrible circumstances without getting choked up. I’ll probably be one of those weepy old people. Sigh…

Comments on this entry are closed.