“Three Quarks Daily”:http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/05/3-quarks-daily-announces-4-annual-blog-prizes.html has an announcement.
we have decided to start awarding four prizes every year in the respective areas of Science, Arts & Literature, Politics, and Philosophy for the best blog post in those fields. Here’s how it’s going to work: Starting next month, the prizes will be awarded every year on the two solstices and the two equinoxes. So, we will announce the winner of the science prize on June 21, the arts and literature prize on September 22, the politics prize on December 21, and the philosophy prize on March 20, 2010. … Just for fun, the first place award will be called the “Top Quark,” and will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the “Charm Quark,” will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the “Strange Quark,” along with two hundred dollars.
Voting rules etc explained at the post in question. Just to be clear, I personally don’t think you should be voting for a CT post in any of these categories. The value of competitions like this is in highlighting bloggers who people would be unlikely to come across otherwise, and we’re high profile enough that we really aren’t a deserving case. But I am very happy that 3QD is taking this initiatve increase the profile of the more intellectual side of the blogosphere (which doesn’t usually do well in larger competitions), and strongly recommend that you nominate good posts, read other nominees, and vote for whoever seems best.
{ 3 comments }
Jonathan Dresner 05.25.09 at 7:13 pm
I wonder where history will fall in these categories? Science seems to include social science, but not all historians agree that we belong there or practice our art in such a way as to be competitive in that category.
sleepy 05.25.09 at 7:52 pm
Replying to the first comment:
Morgan Meis, one of the founders of that page, is in the words of someone who’s worked with him: “pretty much a futurist.”
There’s your answer I’m afraid.
Kadin 05.30.09 at 7:44 am
Top, Charm, and Strange? What, first-generation particles get no lovin’?
Comments on this entry are closed.